DAVID MONROE·
MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2020·

The List of Coincidences

by David Monroe
Monday, October 12, 2020

Tesla and free energy, David Monroe discusses the numbers 3, 6 and 9 and the one quarter wavelength input that produces energy gain stored in standing wave

This was originally a Facebook Note. David added numbers 21 and 22 on Sept. 07/2021, and added number 23 on Sept 11, 2021
(proof that my Tesla’s 3 6 and 9 video has been blacklisted)

I have always gone by the fact that The Truth Always Adds Up, but that can be tricky in a sea of propaganda and misinformation. There have been a number of things that have just kind of fallen in place, things that I was not necessarily looking for, but have found by accident, usually in researching someone’s claims against what I have been finding.

When I started all of this:

I DID NOT KNOW I could demonstrate, using the wave on a string app, what Stan Meyers meant when he said the voltage would rise to infinity, limited only by the equipment.

I DID NOT KNOW that what Tesla used to drive his wireless system with was a 1/4 wavelength and I DID NOT KNOW it had a 6 dB gain of the driving power that is stored on the standing wave, per cycle.

I DID NOT KNOW that the wave model of the electron was a 1 wavelength standing wave.

I DID NOT KNOW that chemistry, string theory, and music are all predicated on standing waves.

I DID NOT KNOW that the periodic table is just adding another electron and a proton ( a 1 wavelength standing wave ) which creates the next element. Literally everything that exists is standing waves.

I DID NOT KNOW that the 1/4 wavelength in Tesla’s wireless system proved his 3, 6, and 9.

NO ONE ELSE OUT THERE has anything that actually shows you how the 3, 6 and 9 relates to free energy. I can explain it and demonstrate it using the wave on a string app. If you input 3 watts of power it has a 6 dB gain, so for each cycle of the input power you get an additional 9 watts of power output, with a total of 12 watts stored on the standing wave per cycle of the input power. Who else can demonstrate that? His wireless system was a 300% over unity . . .

Time is a human construct, so being humans, we should be able to bend time to our will. As it turns out, we actually are! If the daylight savings time experiment has taught us anything, it is that we humans can be flexible in our interpretation and in our experience of time. 

Changing back and forth twice a year between summer time and “natural” time has been the burden of humans for almost half a century now. But what we really did was conduct a great experiment of cutting off one end of the blanket and sewing it on at the other end. This is quite unnecessary and it cannot be very productive to constantly disorient humans with respect to time. As a matter of fact, the European Parliament has come to the conclusion that the summer time experiment should finally be abandoned. 

I believe what really should be abandoned though is our inflexible, almost pedantic, attitude with regard to time zones and timekeeping devices. As it is, we are dividing the surface of the planet into different east/west zones that are delineated by hard, straight lines. There are 24 of those zones, one for every hour of the day, and they divide the world much like a political map. A little exception here and there, but in the main our conception of time has been rigidly geometric and it has been rather divisive. 

Larger time zones?

The Chinese have shown that a more flexible approach to time is possible. In 1949 they ended the division of their country into different time zones. Everyone in China observes Beijing time, despite the fact that the east/west extension of that country would suggest it be divided into five different timezone slices… 

Brown’s gas is a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen obtained from electric disassociation of water into its gaseous components. The gas is also called oxyhydrogen gas. The method of electric disassociation was developed by Yull Brown, an Australian inventor who ended up working with a Chinese company which is currently producing those gas generators.

It appears that using Brown’s gas directly in the air intake of a diesel or LPG powered generator, the efficiency of combustion can be greatly increased, cutting fuel consumption roughly in half. The Brown’s gas generator runs on a small fraction of the electricity produced by the same generator.

The following image is a report from a Japanese company which did a test with a Brown’s gas generator linked to a 10 KW LPG driven electricity generator. Costs per hour of running the generator were cut in half.

More information at www.yullbrownsgas.com

Newton is famous for having said he can describe gravity, but he won’t speculate about its origin.

“Hypotheses non fingo” – I will not deal in hypotheses, Isaac Newton wrote in an essay, “General Scholium”, which was appended to the second edition of his “Principa”.

Since Newton, little progress has been made. We can calculate the effects of gravity, but we do not understand what its cause is, or how it propagates across space. So our understanding of gravity is largely technological, but we continue to grasp and grapple when it comes to describing the origin of this force or its mechanism of action. In a recent exchange of comments on facebook, the question came up again.

Friend: I Feel “Gravity” is nothing of what we are told it is …

Sepp: What is your idea of gravity?

Friend: Light – Collapsing into “Matter” – creating Torsion/Pull …. Like Water (which is Light in different format) spinning down a drain … Toroidal Torsion flow

Sepp: I have a similar idea… in my view, gravity could be an attraction of the energetic patterns that create the manifestation of matter (patterns made of light if you will) towards each other, mediated by torsion, which is a natural characteristic of those patterns. The torsion of two separate patterns that manifest into matter creates a tension, which results in an affinity, an attraction, that we experience as gravity.

Expressed for the first time in “Action at a distance”, an article I wrote some years back… (I just re-read it and marvel at what I sensed already at that time…) The article was first published in my “historical” blog at http://history.hasslberger.com/phy/phy_12.htm

Action at a Distance
A question of viewpoint

by Josef Hasslberger, Rome, September 1998

Abstract

A philosophical description is proposed, of the basic mechanisms of physical universe and especially of the nature of matter, that is compatible with such phenomena as instantaneous action at a distance. It is proposed that material existence in physical space is conditioned and indeed dependent upon the existence of energy patterns necessary for matter to manifest and that interactions occur not between the material manifestations but between the primary energy patterns themselves.

Continue reading “What is gravity?”